![]() |
| Deputy Director of LTPH Helen Chapman |
The biggest issue facing our trade, that of illegal plying for hire (forming unlawful ranks), by private hire drivers, is in a worse state now, than when John Mason and his team took up the appointment.
Two years ago, as ranks and highways representative for the RMT, I spoke to John Mason and bought this issue to his attention.
I pointed out that one of LTPH's officers (Luke Howard) had sent out an email informing drivers that after consulting with TfL's legal department and in their opinion, PHVs could legally wait to be hired outside any venue if legally parked. When I tried to refer to recent case law and relevant Hackney Carriage acts, John stopped me in mid-flow and said;
"If I had been in charge at that time, these emails would never have been sent out"
This statement inferred that he (Mason) agreed that PHVs could not legally wait to be hired and we left Palestra believing this matter would be dealt with.
However since that day, Mason has done absolutely nothing about the issue and has now put up a barrier between representative groups in the shape of an unworkable engagement policy. A policy that contravenes the Data protection act, whereby all members records would be available to LTPH.
Also, Section 4 states; that any trade body with a media outlet, be it a Blog, Magazine or Paper, if commenting on TfL/LTPH, must first submit copy to Mason for approval or face expulsion from consultation meetings. So basically a gagging order, denying freedom of speech.
Mason initially excused trade bodies he felt would not rock the boat.
This group known to the trade as the United Trade Group, did not have to sign or conform to the engagement policy, Mason gave them a free pass.
Another condition of acceptance to consultation rights was the need to have at least 5% of the trade as members, a condition that 2 of the 3 UTG members (LCDC and Unite) did not meet. The engagement policy does not apply to private hire groups such as the GMB and the PHA, who wish to consult with LTPH.
If and only if, Helen Chapman is not working under orders from on high and has a complete free hand to deal with the problem, this could be one of the best things that has happened to the trade for many years.
An LCDC blog moderator recently went against the grain to criticise LTPH's lack of will to address the problem and dug up information on case law and relevant acts that state PHVs can not stand and wait to be hired ( Click here for article).
We have seen many cities around the UK deal with this problem and now it is time to deal with it in the capital.
Good luck Helen, I think you're going to need it.
Editorial Comment.
The lies have to stop!
Multi agency action has to take place on a large scale.
Drivers illegally plying for hire must be prosecuted using the law that is there to protect the License Taxi trade.
Before any new policy is introduced this issue must be dealt with.
It can be done, just look at what Birmingham City Council have achieved.

TfL's legal department are more than useless ,And belive it or not "do not know that much about the taxi trade " I belive Helen will be replaced soon as will John ,so bon voyage and fair well the two of you.
ReplyDeleteI have only recently come across you blog.
ReplyDeleteAnd have now read the excellent UCG news mag
And that's what is is NEWS
THANK YOU FOR YOUR EFFORTS AND KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK
Just resigned from the LTDA after twenty five years, can't believe how much money I've been paying for just a landyard and a diary.
Will now join the UCG scheme.
Its a big ask jim.
ReplyDeleteYou expect LTPH to perform efficiently, something it hasn't manage to do for many, many years.
And of course, in the background we have the agenda to kill us off.
Men ARE coming to kill us...
The best thing about this is Mason has openly admitted he is not up to the job,A job he has been well paid for.So nothing short of his resignation or his dismissal,should be accepted,
ReplyDeleteHelen take some advice from an old cabby.
ReplyDeletePut the ID badges on hold, then get the ball rolling with these lines of illegal Minicabs and court the goodwill of the Taxi drivers who can make your job easier.
I've followed your tweets and articles and I know you are not the enemy.
Don't make the same mistake as John
And the trade will back you to the hilt.
I dont think it matters who holds the title and thats all it is,Nothing will change as long as Taxi hating Hendy pulls the strings
ReplyDeleteThe reason they do not attack the touting problem is because the extent of the problem would then be exposed for the world to see.
ReplyDelete'Sweep it under the carpet' is the order of the day at TfL.
John Mason himself told me when I questioned him on the legallity of Satellite Offices... "It depends on how you interpret the law"
No John, it depends on how James Button interprets the law, and he is wrong.
Numerous case law tells a different story!
I can't say I disagree with any of the above posts.
The carpet to sweep this all under is getting smaller and smaller.
Dizzy,
ReplyDeleteThe truth is that TfL have never bothered to get Legal Advice on interpreting the law as the RMT discovered.
When Button stated that cars waiting unbooked were a rank, he changed overnight at TfL from an 'authority on cab law' to @an out of town solicitor'.
Watch this blog for more revelations on LTPH and its dealings.
Apart from the canteen till at Palestra there cannot be anyone who will miss the unpleasant natured Mr Stock.
since when has Dave Stock been enforcement?, He was head of service delivery & vehicle compliance???
ReplyDeleteRead the post numpty
ReplyDeleteNo one said Dave Stock was in charge of enforcement
JB