![]() |
| Director of LPH John Mason |
This would be the same for almost all on-line blogs.
We get most of our content from other trade blogs, papers (both trade and national) and forums, plus we invite drivers to contribute. We have always had the policy that if our posts are proved to be inaccurate we will of course change or remove, which we have done on a recent post after receiving your email.
Although we made minor adjustments and posted your email, you still seem intent on insulting the integrity of the editorial staff.
The tone of virtually every email you've sent us is unacceptable from a man who holds such a prestigious office. You even had the audacity to copy me in to an email you sent one of your junior officers saying I was nothing to worry about, just a old father Christmas look a like.
![]() |
| Who's watching the Watchers? |
We also note that in your recent email you failed to answer a single question.
How diplomatic of you John!
New York police officer, Frank Serpico, once famously said;
"How much does it have to be, before it is wrong and perceived as a bribe, $1...$100...$1,000.?
To stand in the street and receive a brown envelope and a bag stuffed with diaries was extremely poor judgement on your behalf and that of the LTDA. These items should have been dispatched and received though the correct channels. We would have never seen this behaviour from Ed Thomson or Roy Ellis.
Before posting the article from the UCG website, I personally contacted the Chairman and Vice Chair of the RMT, who both confirmed the destination and content of the Mayors letter from Bob Crow.
Bob Crow would only take the trouble to write to a politician on a matter of this importance, not a glorified office boy.
I also spoke to people who were outside Palestra, who confirmed they saw you give an orange LTDA bag to a woman who was standing with a group of new Taxi drivers on finals day.
We understood, after talking to an LCDC member that Mr Davis attended the meeting with the mayor, as he should have as part of the UTG, along with a senior member of Unite the union. But if we take your word that only Mr Oddy was there to represent the trade, this would have serious implications that the Mayor and TfL are now only consulting with the LTDA.
John, you seem to spend so much time questioning the accuracy of my blog and yet for the last two years, the LTDA's Taxi magazine has printed insults and lies about the RMT and are now attacking the UCG in the same way...Yet, not one single word from you, just constant support for this one org above all the others, even to the extent of accrediting them with the achievements of others...seems strange John.
After all, are you not supposed to be impartial?
In the same vein, questions must be asked as to how a director of a large private hire owned company can impartially represent the Licensed Taxi trade on the board of TfL. Surely there is a conflict of interest!


Well done, It's sick bring back the pco honest and fair unlike this mob....
ReplyDeleteWhere's your LTDA diary , Can't see it on your desk Mr Mason...
ReplyDeleteHe won't get he's M&S vouchers then, will he?
DeleteJim, this is great stuff mate.
ReplyDeleteWhy should they keep pulling the wool over our eyes.
They have to by bought to book
There must be an investigation into these allegations
Who do they think they are
They been getting away with it for much too long
A more honourable man would resign his commission
ReplyDeleteUnfit for purpose
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteRe concerned UCG member
DeleteNice try Mark
To: British Transport Police, Met.Police, CoL Police, NY Taxi & Limo, Keystone cops, anyone Please.
ReplyDeleteDo you want to licence the worlds finest taxi trade? We NEED help now!
Tfl/LTPH are morally bankrupt.
Though the bribe or gift be small, The the fault is great.
ReplyDeleteBig well done jim. You've taught me more in the last 5 mins about Ltda than I knew in the last 20 years will be leaving them
ReplyDeleteCollusion is a very dirty word! Not too far away from Corruption.
ReplyDelete