Despite the fact that it has been pointed out to him that this strategy is improper, unlawful and will achieve no reduction in emissions.
He has been given information which shows the Department of
Transport Best Practice Guide for Local Authorities saying that an Age Limit
should NOT be imposed because it will not necessarily improve emissions and
because it could be seen as arbitrary.
He has been given the information which shows that in order
to comply with its legal requirements as a Public Body TFL would need to
conduct proper emissions conformity testing to prove that older taxis are
causing more pollution (which they obviously don’t) and no such testing has
ever been conducted.
![]() |
| Death Warrant Dec 31st 2011 |
He has also been given information that LTI exploit a
loophole in the law which allows them to avoid having to conduct In Service
Emissions Conformity Testing, (which every manufacturer has to do)
because they produce less than 5000 vehicles a year.
| LTI exploit a loophole in the law |
He has also told me that no consideration will be given to
any Eco-Power system as a retrofit clean up to achieve Euro 4; no proper
explanation why-just a straight refusal. It seems likely that whatever
exemptions are given (if any) that it will not be done as a result of proper
research or test evidence, which is again does not comply with their legal
requirements.
He has said that an announcement will be made soon about
exemptions to the age limit.
![]() |
| TX4 Failed Euro 3 Test |
The newer taxis are supposed to be Euro 5 but in my view it
is questionable as to whether it will achieve Euro 5 standards for any period
of time.
It again begs the question why force drivers to scrap taxis
which could achieve a reasonable standard of emissions and then force drivers
to buy a new taxi at great expense which has questionable emissions performance
anyway?
The latest news is that TFL are asking for a sponsor to help
drivers buy a new taxi which is allegedly Euro 5
Yet again a public body trying to implement a commercial
project in order to excuse its own inadequate policies.
It is again incorrect practice for a Public Body to act in
this way.
Another opportunity to generate some extra cash perhaps?
And cash for who?
I have said it before and will say it again; the only way
that the London Taxi trade will experience proper and legitimate regulation is
if there is a regime change at TFL.
The only way to achieve this is to demonstrate and demand a
Public Inquiry into the unlawful and improper conduct of a Public Body.
It is not sufficient to try and challenge each individual
issue.
I am also currently speaking with a national media
organisation who are researching for a programme to conduct an investigation
into the unlawful, improper and corrupt practices at TFL. If anyone has any
evidence which they would like to submit please get in touch. I would like to
thank those that have already been involved, but the more the merrier!
Dave Davies
Eco-Power


What will they want next ? Euro 9 ? They dictate what vehicles we drive, we buy them at ridiculous inflated prices and then they tell us they are not fit for purpose !
ReplyDeleteAnd TFL have the audacity to say there is no hidden agenda !
Peter Hendy & Ken Livingstone have always hated The London Taxi Trade I believe and they have and will do everything in their power to kill us off !
We need to challenge these Taxi Haters as a matter of urgency !
There is only so much we can take !
8829 Semtex
Agreed 8829 time for a massive showdown ! 14
ReplyDeleteThis article points out more illegalities at TfL. The age limit and emissions strategy is now proven to be another dictatorship policy forced upon the Licensed Taxi Trade, endorsed by individuals chosen by TfL.
ReplyDeleteThere is no negotiating with TfL and Masons negotiating table isn't worth sitting at. There’s a time for talk and a time for action and now is the time for action. All avenues of conciliation have been closed by Mason’s “my way or the highway” approach to his job, and his farce of an engagement policy............
The Private Hire consultation was a farce and TfL think they have pulled off pulled off the "bilk of the century".
TfL have pushed the STaN agenda as far as they dare, as they know it’s a legal argument they can't possibly win. Policing and enforcement has been tailored to suit the illegal back door agenda they are imposing on us until the Law Commission cobble together an alternative to accommodate their agenda and further legitimise Private Hire.
Unite the union are adopting a TfL attitude towards its members in the disgraceful LE/230 Branch. The committee are running the branch like a communist dictatorship and are breaching member’s rights to freedom of speech.
The LCDC are in breach of FSA regulations, they have failed to meet the basic requirements laid out by both the LCDC rule book and the FSA.
The LTDA are changing their name to the (WOFO) “We’re Out For Ourselves!”
The UTG are imposters selling smoke, mirrors and snake oil to the most gullible of cab drivers. They couldn’t negotiate their way out of a revolving door !
There is only one avenue left for any cab driver concerned about the future our trade, and that is to join forces and back the call to arms from the UCG for the demonstration of demonstrations to tell TfL and the government what to do with their corrupt policies !!
We need a public enquiry into the disgraceful, undemocratic and illegal way these inept unscrupulous individuals are running TfL and in particular LTPH.
Agree,we should draw our line in the sand now and say enoughs enough.
ReplyDeleteGreat links to STaN agenda, top right hand side of the opening page.
ReplyDelete